>>92335473I heard it was the opposite? Like, it would make sense if this made me gain rather than lose T - if the body thinks you have a woman already because you regularly goom, then there's less incentive for high-T behaviors, risk taking, bravado, etc., and it's more prudent to be more cautious and rational, right? Whereas if you have no woman, then you'd need more T to attract one, leading to increased T production?
Can any doctor or biologistbuds confirm or deny this?
>>92335516chu~
