>>80387047>having to specify at all means it's not a default thingyou realize the logic of this means that literally any preference for anything is 'uncommon' then, right? Retard
>if the ideas come from a place of madness they're going to need to be taken with that in mindyou're presupposing Freud was insane in a circular way based purely on his ideas as a way to discredit his ideas
you're begging the question essentially
"Freud's ideas can't be true because he was crazy"
"well how do you know that?"
"well because his ideas are obviously crazy!"
>and most mammals fall into the 90% range of shared DNA with each othernot as closely as chimps do to us and you can see from their behavior they share many other similarities to that other animals don't have
it wouldn't even make sense that we would be magically totally different to something that we're so similar to
>this is none of my concernwow nice argument 'well I simply don't know what you're talking about so I can dismiss it' ok retard
the idea that just because we are further along in time now somehow means our nature itself is any different to earlier societies or that we're more moral somehow in a way that changes us on a psychological level just has no evidence
>having to point it out sounds pretty abnormal to mewhat kind of retardation is this? 'well if you have to make a point it means the point is wrong' what?
sorry, let me restate this so your idiotic brain can understand:
not only do some cultures still do the practice of marrying cousins as being normal but MOST cultures do this and have done this so it clearly is normal
>isn't it a thing that people with siblings aren't into it? I would assume it's the idea of someone being close to you not wanting to fuck your siblingthis is so naive lol
man, your counter-arguments are so bad
just accept you're a chimp with a thin veneer of being civillized and that you wanna fuck your mom on a subconscious level already, it's not hard to accept