>>82966147I love it when particularly stupid and gullible anons, like this faggot, think a proposed situation being odd or exceptional is an argument against it being true in its own right. Like, the restate-opposing-argument-followed-by-sarcastic-interjection rhetorical formula only works if the narrative you're mocking is actually ABSURD, not merely unusual. Clinging to the canard regardless of it not applying doesn't convince anybody, it just makes you look like a desperate facebook boomer with no personality and even less of a case.
Like, oh, suuuuure anon, eeeevery single human who has eeeeever been born encounters obstacles to their work at exactly the same rates.
Nobody is eeeeever lucky or unlucky. Surely that's just "cope", right...? RIGHT...!?
What a joke. Get better arguments.
