>>86272916You can't get earnestly mad at people for not being able to identify a single encryption method out of the hundreds that are available by sight alone, and then being able to do it again but to also know you need to download a program to decrypt it because none of the online solutions work. That's just bad social skills. I don't mind asking people to put in some effort to get the paywalled stuff, I'd even do things like
>>86272866 that sounds fun, but you failed to communicate what was actually supposed to be happening, what the goal was, and that's why you've spent hours having to explain it to people
>>86273572I figured it out
