>>86745566By this exact same logic you present in this post, you could argue that we should be able to talk about /wvt/ vtubers, or corpos here.
You are a malicious actor, intent at undermining /BIG/. It's more than apparent in how you present my concern for the thread's quality as some form of negative:
>It is you who reveal himself, for this is what you actually fear.>Refusing the number talk is based not weather it is pertinent to the thread but your own personal preferencesNo. It's just another factor. You've taken a piece completely out of context, which further showcases your nature. You've abandoned the pretense of good-willed discussion and are now openly agitating against this general.
>>86745604Inshallah.
