>>24369128Yeah, imagine if Youtube had real people actually monitoring their platform and fixing the most egregious problems while multiplying their reach with AI, instead of leaning on AI alone.
How hard would it be? Think about it: out of the many millions of live streams in the platform only about some (let's say) 400 per hour reach 10k CCV. Here is a quick fix
1) every 10k+ CCV (some 400 per hour) go into a dashboard similar to live-ranking
2) jannies have 2 buttons: 1) destroy 2) whitelist
3) destroyed streams are banned, channel owner can appeal, stream is removed from the dashboard
4) whitelisted streams are removed from the list, channel get +1 on their reputation ranking
5) channels above a certain reputation ranked, if the jannies click "destroy", pop up a warning
>this channel had X whitelisted streams in the past Y period of time. Are you sure you want to destroy the stream?You could EASILY have a team of no more than 20 people doing nothing but that, checking nothing but title, thumb of the channel owner, thumb of the stream and destroying the obvious problematic ones, no AI needed.
The problem scales easily too: if you reduce the threshold to streams over (let's say) 5k CCV you increase the teach to (let's say) 80 people.
AI can do a secondary search to make the jannies job easier but that would be that, auxiliary and not the main way to deal with it.
