>>56621426you can tell they're still not a big company just because of how bad their graphics are. he clarified that the numbers on the screen is the talents' splits, yet they put in "100% on us" there, so they're mixing for some reason? i don't know if just they thought it looked bad to put 0% or what, but you have to be consistent while presenting information like this. it also seems to somewhat contradict the pie chart that showed the 15% for streaming expenses being taken out of the talent's cut. no i'm not a nijifag, just trying to interpret the graphics.
