>>70294656I love how the board that spends weeks chasing rrats based on morsels of unconnected online paper trails can't even bothered to look into the mountains of preponderant evidence of Rowling being a TERF. It is very easy for a normie to pretend an isolated remark is the only evidence of a long track record of scattered ideologically consistent online comments, but you would expect /vt/ to know better. But since having your gender identity wires crossed means your the spawn of Satan /here/ Rowling conveniently has no history of seething about shemales.