>>63363937>He is speaking about how an artist wants to display their character,Anon, that's a huge part of why he's getting flak. The character is ENTIRELY the creation of the author and, by virtue of being fictional, it has NO AGENCY!
He could have a point, had he said
>I don't like non consensual fiction because I prefer works with strong willed women exercising their fantasies. FOR FUCK SAKE; even in this god forsaken thread>I want Mori to sit on my faceis not a controversial take. There are blokes that have "power fantasies" about subjugating women, while others have submissive fantasies about being used by them.
I'll even quote a very famous song about this very subject
>SWEET DREAMS ARE MADE OF THIS, WHO AM I TO DISAGREE?>I TRAVEL THE WORLD AND THE SEVEN SEAS, EVERYBODY IS LOOKING FOR SOMETHING!(and here is the relevant part)
>SOME OF THEM WANT TO USE YOU, SOME OF THEM WANT TO GET USED BY YOU>SOME OF THEM WANT TO ABUSE YOU, SOME OF THEM WANT TO BE ABUSED!The problem with what he said was not the content, was the choice of words.
>non binary>empowerment>object>consentAll of the words that 100% peg him as part of a very noxious segment of the current cultural zeitgeist.
