>>42458620Ehh I'd say just assume there's a decently robust private property laws in contemporary /who/. So it would just be owned by the sanalites, perhaps some sort of entity that represents all of them. Doesn't have to be a company. Again most of that depends on how you want to tell their story. Do you want them to have a harder time at first? Have them owe companies who are contracted to build the bakery money since they have gone a bit over-ambitious with some features. Since it's counted as an essential service the tax rate should be pretty low.
>>42441719Hoo are they?
