Quoted By:
Someone asked me last thread and my dumbass wrote a reply to an archived thread
If youre wondering what I feel about 'low quality' lore, Ive said before that I support a survival of the fittest stance. There is no bad writing quality unless (You) do it to yourself.
Three things to take into account
>Effort
How much effort has the writer put in their work? Did they do reps? Did they developed their side of the world?
>Popularity
Is the lore entry representing the home thread very well? Is the entry able to fit in well with the larger setting? Is the entry well received? If there are multiple writers for a single thread, what do each of them think of your entry?
And most important of all
>Feedback
Did you gave feedback? Did you pointed out mistakes and gave constructive criticisms? Can the writer rebutt and defend?
Feedback is the most important! You fucks suck at it!
Lore is not set in stone. If there are mistakes and rough edges you can revisit it later. If you wanna do something that will cause loops and shitstorm, defend yourself and proof that you deserve to put your idea out there! not fling shit around like retarded apes!
As for the new reps, hag anon and new phase anon, welcome. As long as your work represents your home thread and helps construct the world of ours youre welcomed to do any wild things you want