While this isn't the full 0.3 dataset, decided to start a run on rouwei to see how it does.
Spent yesterday testing and there is some stuff I like, but also some stuff I don't like about it.
Pros:
Eyes feel "sharper" than noob vpred 0.5
Default style is nice
Good at moody lighting and such
The weird "by" syntax for artists isn't needed, at least not yet, and for shorter prompts actually seems to produce better results for me.
Neutral:
I feel like it may have even more prompt adherance than noob, particularely when it comes to non canon looks of characters. What I mean is that when I prompted for a miku with black and blonde hair, noob gave me miku with her usual hair, while rouwei gave me something that isn't miku, but does have black and blonde hair. Generally a positive, but seems to have overwritten the character here
Seems to be much less influenced by some artists in mixes (csrb and ciloranko for example)
Composition wise it is similar enough to noob vpred
Negative:
Colors seem a little washed out and it refuses to get as bright as noob (even for long prompts and with BREAK)
Worse object permanence/coherency
Defaults to a hazy/foggy look sometimes
Non-chuuba comparisons:
Migu:
https://files.catbox.moe/abwn4r.png (rouwei)
https://files.catbox.moe/3ontw6.png (noobvpred0.5)
Cirno:
https://files.catbox.moe/0mq0yi.png (rouwei)
https://files.catbox.moe/8v9d3k.png (noobvpred0.5)
If it isn't better at learning than noob is, the color issues get fixed or someone has a good argument for it, I don't think I'm gonna end up using it as the actual base as noobvpred0.6 just feels like a straight upgrade in terms of style, color and anatomy so far.
>>89750965Holy shit!
>>89746160While I think flat tenma looks better, that's still very unfortunate.
>>89768586>https://files.catbox.moe/q6o3b8.pngkek, seems like both aren't really comfortable here
>>89778769Biboo got some balls!
>>89780413That plan and its trails are really nice
