>>38603640I had to use 225 tokens worth of "feet, shoes, socks" excludes to make this work
>>38603679Now we're comparing different AI taggings, that's not what I'm memeing against, and I had no idea WD could tag either. My point was vs. completely manual tagging, because that answered anon's question more thoroughly - "what's most important when tagging". Also if you always want embed shylily to have accurate tats, wouldn't that image then be a poor choice for the dataset?
I'm not trying to be obtuse or a shitter, sorry if it seems that way.