>>55009043Sure, but you can't refute empirically ongoing loss of income. I laid it out for you, but numbers seem to be too hard and fee fees more important. You haven't made a single counterpoint other than "money isn't everything". It's not. But it is required to live and retire on. And that is increasingly expensive every year.
Like I said I hope she is OK with her decision, because if she isn't 100% on board with your worldview, it's grim from here on out for her.
There is nothing to concede because the second empirical data, ie money, was brought in to this conversation you failed to engage and went back to your abstract world view in "defense".
Unironically take that shit back to r*ddit where you belong and take this capital fucking L with you.
