>>19367359she didn't elaborate nor even confirm if that was it (even though I'm 100% sure that's it because she's too ashamed to even go back on the subject) but from where the conversation was coming from and where it was going, it sounded like she did it out of her own volition
>>19367233I wouldn't really call it on brand even for her because she has never alluded being on that level of degeneracy, especially since the way she worded it just made it seem like it was pure and complete curiosity
not complaining though because I find it hot and I'm sure other scatchads feel the same 