>>24047948>Yet another fictional scenario. No one has said that, not a single fucking soulLike this one? Here,
>A "bad" design can be made to look good with the right art styleThis is probably you, not my fault you're retarded and used the words right and art style.
Rather than style, the focus should be moved to the qualities of the art.
Art style has a specific meaning other than the five major qualities of the visual arts, and saying right just implies the style selected has to be specific. Which would be my cause for contention.
Based on that and the other or so comments made earlier, I'd contend the style you select doesn't need to be specific and the quality of the art is the only important thing.
If you can meet a minimum standard that needs to be met, not a higher threshold, then you're all good. The design shouldn't even really matter as everyone agrees.
This is why nobody likes /asp/, a bucket of hostile little crab retards who screech about people arguing with ghosts and ACHUALLY being the delusional schizo one at the mere drop of a pin, and before we do a whataboutism, who's going to be offended by an offhand about people overspending on their models when that person doesn't exist? You're getting offended? On behalf of the caricature you contend doesn't exist? Moron behavior.
Have fun crabs, I'm going back to /wvt/. Enjoy the 2views.
