>>61724642Oh yeah there's nothing wrong with some relatively low investment stuff like that, if that's the right way to phrase it, I'm just saying that's not what I'm particularly into nowadays
>>61725128>but you're starting at a real bad place for not making something trashy.Believe me I do recognize that, which is why I mentioned that execution is what'll be important and that it'd be a challenge. I might not succeed, but I'd at least like to try so as to give myself the chance of delivering something I want for myself rather than waiting for the unlikely outcome that someone else has that feeling.
