>>90039093>oppai loli discussionAn issue I've had from my experiences with Illustrious models, is that the "loli" tag is on the weak side, and does not seem to change the character's proportions in any significant way. You can more or less make up for it by doing the following:
- cranking up the "loli" tag's weight (anywhere from 1.5 to 2.0 shouldn't seriously cook the gen, besides, you can probably un-cook it by lowering the weight back afterwards, and then img2img/upscaling the image);
- adding "child" and "petite" to the prompt (messing with their weights doesn't seem to do anything. you should fine-tune your gen via the "loli" tag instead);
- adding "wide hips" to the negative prompt.
If you only do the first step, the resulting gens will be more shortstack-like, as you'll see below.
Here is a test non-upscaled set with the same seed, that shows how applying these steps does more to loli-fy a character than just adding "loli" at 1.0 weight, which seems useless most of the time on Illust. The base prompt is a simple nude Fauna with huge tits.
Base gen:
https://files.catbox.moe/t5omjk.png"loli" at 1.0 weight:
https://files.catbox.moe/2as48n.png"loli" at 1.5 weight:
https://files.catbox.moe/15nj0k.png"loli" at 2.0 weight:
https://files.catbox.moe/vdwalh.png"loli" at 2.0 weight, plus "child" and "petite" tags, and "wide hips" negative tag:
https://files.catbox.moe/1jbmba.pngTo top it off, here's a few more gens with the same prompt as that last pic, so you can see it's more effective than not:
https://files.catbox.moe/65dr4p.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/b2ueo0.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/k4sowq.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/9vkj8b.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/al5hq5.pngAll of that said, this is still a janky and imperfect solution, and you should still gacha a decent amount to get the ideal gen, but I hope this will bring you closer to what you're looking for!
