>>10801383Stealth art critique thread? You bitch, I'm in.
The bad:
Ina's art is jarring because Hololive characters are usually represented as their original selves, with a different artistic style distinct to each one thrown together at random like darts at a board. This is one of the insanely few times they're all depicted together with a singular cohesive art style, which is uncanny because people aren't used to it.
The worse:
Better song than umisea's original, which was a poorly thought out frenetic clusterfuck.
The good:
The art is decent (my honest reaction was "sameface?") and the song is fun, which makes for a good showing of Ina's artistic skill. It's not god tier like a dedicated team of veteran animators would be, but it's quite far from redjuice's crimson abortion.
The contructive:
The outfits are iconic, but I feel as if the faces could use a bit more distinction to set them apart from one another. They don't all have to be original art style, but incorporating a bit of a deviation from the standard proportions/expressions into each character that's reminiscent of their usual appearance would make them stand out more. They don't have to be full caricatures, but I'd imagine styling them based on their motifs in the right way might improve Ina's artist reimaginings of the Holomems.
IMO, the reimaginings don't actually need to be 1:1 ports into her own style unless the company mandated it. Taking a few liberties to add or modify their design elements might even be more well received than "the same characters just in a different art style." But that's just my own opinion as a shitposter on /vt/, and it's not necessarily relevant to or indicative of true popular sentiment.