>>64268103>with literally no evidenceapart from her well-documented menhera moments? if you exclude those of course you won't "have" any evidence.
>who has been watching heryou mean believe a cluster B's lies instead of looking at their deeds? holy shit, you're in for a rude awakening.
>she's manic depressivewhat part of "most common misdiagnosis" did you not understand?
>.for the last time, as long as she doesn't harm the kettle, I don't care. if she does, she'll gain one hell of an anti.
>Verification not required. 