>>41083134i just called it 7thholo on my end, but i suppose the best and least confusing way to refer to them would be "7thholo2_c", "7thholo3_a" etc etc if they're worth listing in the rentry at all to differentiate them depending on their 7th layer model of choice.
so far it seems very "artsy" from my tests.
>>41083118i'm sorry that they won't be as quick as they can be, anon. there's lots of mixes for 7th layer. being a wagie BLOWS.