>>63749979>>63747412>Wake up anon, it's christmas!>>63750209>like can (you) explain to me what is the appeal of that funa in that particular style? what do you want me to see and feel?Sure, this specific stylemix is really good at showing textile interactions, especially partial transparency, the "thickness" of fabric, its interaction with flesh (as shown on the fauna postrel squish), as well as a nice fraying of hair and creasing of leather (see my last post, the seat.) These are pleasing to me since they sell the apparel and environment and their interactions as being something tangible and less "drawn on" and flat as with most 2d styles. The style suffers in regards to torso elongation and fingers, but those can usually be hidden with posing, and when I want to look at nice fabrics and detailed hair, this is the style I go with.
>you can make better stuff thoughIf I always just make the same thing it gets boring, I have an incredible range of AI tools at my disposal and by god I'm gonna try them all, if not then what's the point of it?
>>63750450Not me though, I can live with the ribcages being kinda pronounced like that but I don't want to overdo it if it's avoidable. I generally don't like prompting anyone being unhappy (unless it's like a cute kind of sad)
