>>91662998>do you think your clients can articulate what they want good enough that an ai can make it for themdepends on what they're trying to get done. most of my work involves video production and AI is far from good at that, but that's obviously something that's bound to change soon. either way image generation is already extremely advanced and you can use shit like Canva to get decent looking logos and layouts done with ease and on your own, which is my entire point
>be it's dofirent for pics but for coding there's no way my clients can even say in Englishthis probably depends and again, you're talking about how AI works now. I can ask ChatGPT to generate a tampermonkey userscript to do X and Y and with a bit of back and forth it'll give me something that's functional and that does precisely what I wanted. imagine how this will work by 2030 for other kinds of programming languages
>>91663040it is for now, since I have a
worthless piece of paper saying I'm a bachelor of design, and I'm registered and get paid weekly enough to survive
