>>91487687>"As you can see, she her initial numbers were lower in her 1st year than her 2nd year thanks to inertia gained from the timeslot-" >BU-BUT HE SAID 5K BUT IT WAS 6K GOTCHA!! XD"The argument isn't about exact number retard, it's about how her average doubled after year 1
>>91487727>you are 100% the crossposterYou are 100% retarded
>inb4 HTML edit cope