>>55327047desu the more I look at the excel, I'm starting to regret this over the limit calc formula I set,
>>55308290. I wanted to test favoritism by taking the highest value they gave to whatever member and seeing how big that number from the others in respect to the limit of 10. But now I'm really regretting it. Some people are posting 100/10 and it's extremely skewing my data. In the next thread I might just round all the numbers that go past 10 be limited to 10 only. Anyway update we are now 100 anons in just 1 thread the last data was came from 2 threads.
