>>69095274the stock dip is the only major actionable harm. everything else is peanuts so far. they can't speculate on lost future money she could have earned them, that's not a result of her statements. they cant sue them for defamation and expect a positive result without trying to pin the entirety of their stock woes upon them. otherwise people were just talking shit online, and even JP law requires a reparable harm.
you could try to act upon some of the folks who are refusing to associate, and you have slightly more of a case, but then you have to try to compel other businesses to testify to the reason they stopped associating with niji. those statements in court if they say something like 'they treated doki poorly', well, that could be seen as more defamation by niji if they're backing this asinine legal theory that somehow anything bad is defamation. given that quite a few of these companies are incorporated in the US, you'd probably also have to try to compel companies from overseas to testify in JP court, that's just not happening.
my moneys on no actual lawsuit ever actually hitting a courtroom though, they're going to settle with some sort of clause of 'everyone shuts the fuck up' and move on. there might not even be any money that changes hands as a result.
