>>88166149>>88166345the concept itself isn't a "bro alcohol lmao" type of talkshow, its a pure chilling one where you just get together and spend some time with folks, the fun resides in just doing that, it also tries to serve as a concept for future self-sustainment without the need of any one particular host, neither waffles nor me act like the kings and governors of the idea and what exactly allows you to join or not. Furthermore something like what
>>88166173 says, you could very well lie and act like you have something to drink while staying sober the whole time, there is no way to manually 100% confirm who is and who isn't drinking without being anal about it.
>you should just limit it to people who are gonna be drinking, otherwise its gonna be awkward for the people who wanna commit to drinking (like me) if there's non-drinkers also in there.while on one hand it stands as a reality that it could very well be kinda uncomfortable to have someone there who isn't drinking with you, sometimes you can still have conversations with completely sober people while you are drunk and find them interesting, it isn't truly like you enter a completely different realm of reality when you get drunk or something of the sort; and for the other end of the argument, where it is annoying to have people constantly complain about how you are drinking and whatnot, it should really be not something that will happen as that would disrupt the vibe (thing we are not looking for), nor it should be truly expected as it is part of the premise that people WILL be drinking
, think like the podcast cold ones, there had been multiple people who didn't drink at all but still participated of it because they wanted to, the same thing>>88166190Agree.
