>>81676419>lf, it didn't help as well that this guys aren't just.. good, >>81676535>In order for it to work, they would need to have a different child agency to rebuild their brand from scratch .Yeah, I think it’s the agency that’s preventing male vtubers from working.
Let’s look at how Brave, an agency that doesn’t have that stigma, is doing
>globie (mixed): massive failure>yumenos (all male): LITERAL ONE VIEW VTUBERS Well, maybe Brave just suck at recruiting too. Let’s look at SONY
>Vee (mixed): massive failure>PRISM (was girls only, relatively successful, they added males): failed so hard SONY didn’t even sell them afterward, just told the remaining vtubers to pack up and go home and continue with their models and channels if they wanted I don’t know how many experiments will have to be run in the name of “REAL MALE VTUBERS HAVE NEVER BEEN TRIED” until maybe people realize they’re chasing a market that does not exist in any self sustainable way