>>83007888In English, words like "it" and "that" are called 'indicatives.' Indicatives can only be used on their own in place of nouns if you are able to *indicate* what specific item you're talking about through some other means, such as pointing (when in-person) or attaching adjectives to further discern which "that" you're talking about (this usage case is usually used when the item in question is unknown by the speaker, such as "what is that green thing?"). Using an indicative on its own in place of a noun with no requisite reference makes an incoherent sentence, because it could be about anything, because the subject of the sentence is not clearly defined.
You needed an actual noun at least once, because just saying "it" in context (in response to the "Immy is the best sister in the world" ritualpost), what the "it" refers to isn't clear because said ritualpost isn't a statement about a noun in a way that clearly indicates anything other than anon's love for Immy. In context, your question would be asking "Can Immy lean into anon loving her, or has she not found a place for that?" when read through English grammar and formatting.
