>>4177002This anon is right as far as independent streamers are concerned (anyone whose familiar with the numbers knows that if a stream is big enough to 'steal' sales - you're already making more money than you're losing).
But you need to remember that a company like Cover has legal liability and gaming companies won't neccesarily react to it same way. Name me another corporate entity that regularly shows content made by other companies without express legal permission. You can't. Cover isn't in the wrong here, you guys are just being brainlet idealists. If Cover didn't follow these rules and there was real fallout from the damage (like retirements etc) you hypocrits would be blaming Cover for being dumb enough to stream with no legal protection. (Which they would be)
