>>55719685>not know what the word arbitrary means or whatIt was absolutely arbitrary
They could used wins, in that case it was a 3-way tie
As they poster said
>>55714978 they could've used point differential in which ID would've won
What they wind up doing was use point totals in which JP won
But all of that is besides the point and just you moving the goal post, people claimed EN was going to get "Destroyed" "Swept" "Dismantled" "Hoed" "Slutted" and "Creampied" were wrong because in the gameplay they went 1-1 and their only wasn't in a dominate fashion but a close match they could've won
