>>51444578>cjxlexample
cjxl.exe 1686721741000275-1686701555955401.jpg 1686721741000275-1686701555955401.jxl -e 9 --brotli_effort=11
JPEG XL encoder v0.9.0 2d4ad8f3 [SSE4,SSSE3,SSE2]
Note: Implicit-default for JPEG is lossless-transcoding. To silence this message, set --lossless_jpeg=(1|0).
Read JPEG image with 2360993 bytes.
Encoding [Container | JPEG, lossless transcode, effort: 9 | JPEG reconstruction data],
Compressed to 1914742 bytes including container
C:\>...\51338587 17s 914ms
18s to save 20% on an already compressed JPG. Losslessly. But MEGA can't do shit with it...
>>51444968There IS technically "one simple trick" - JPEG XL. But Google are gigantic faggots. Avoiding delving straight into /g/ territory with this QRD:
>Chromium adds JPEG XL support>via an "about:flag" or an "experiment" or whatever they call it so you have to opt in and nobody knows>the nerds that do know fucking love it and start using it>Google removes JXL flag because "nobody uses it">the fuck that removed it is one of the lead developers of WebP - an arguably SHIT image formatTL;DR office politics is keeping us from having a superior image format that could replace both JPG and PNG yesterday
Cute Ninner. I love the "branding" on the box lmao.
