>>86909333Turns out I had a bit of time, upscaled a few other decent poses. Unfortunately I wonder if my AMD card is giving up the ghost - this set took me ~30-45s per iteration while upscaling. Wonder I checked a wrong setting somewhere...
https://files.catbox.moe/uljd9a.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/doc9va.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/6vyltj.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/9av3ey.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/gxkst1.png>>86915666Actually just use fewer tags and let it interpret the scene. But you also get a lot of weird ones due to the variance. YMMV.
>>86920450Thanks, seems like an interesting trick. Does it only work for close-ups?
Also great gen - head out of frame my beloved.
>>86924307>>86927691These are nice, could you share the prompt? Is it mainly "incoming attack" carrying the gen?
>>86926672Once again, head out of frame my beloved. Veryh nice tummies too TWL. Also good luck on the mixing, perhaps drop one of the LoRAs or tune down further?
>>86927176Sorry, may not be able to get to it. Put in the request anchor? But have more Junas (above).
>>86933757Damn great set, really hot poses and angles.
>>86932488Thank you, finally a new Ina LoRA.
