>>80502930>because that means you're completely ignoring the very thing that you would need to measure to determine whether there's an improvement in Gura's ghosting or not.That's not true at all. You're suggesting that Gura ghosting us is defined by the time she isn't streaming, but that's false. In fact, it's very easy to prove you wrong by example.
Scenario A: Gura streams every other day for a year. During the days she doesn't stream, she doesn't say anything.
Scenario B: Gura streams every day every other month for a year. During the months she doesn't stream, she doesn't say anything.
In both scenarios, Gura streams about the same amount. However, no one has ever claimed Gura not streaming for 1 day is ghosting. Which means there is zero ghosting in scenario 1 and 6 one-month long ghosting periods in scenario 2.
So ghosting is dependent on the number and duration of her absenses.
Last year, from January to July, she never ghosted us for month long periods of time even though she streamed only half as much, and that includes her staying in Japan for 3 months.
As for things like the dodgers appearance counting against ghosting, that doesn't make sense. How is a pre recorded appearance not ghosting? At no point did she actually talk to us during that game. I understand your notion that tweets should maybe count as not ghosting, but at this point, we're literally just going to devolve into the krabs poster argument.
>That's not the point that she's improving from. She's improving from where she was in 2023. See above.I agree to an exent, but only if you're considering August 18 to December 31. The rest of the year had less ghosting, as I explained earlier.
Also, you really like to call the dates from which I compare things arbitrary, so I'd love to hear why you think yours isn't.
