Sakuran rep
>>28951833>1. Should the borders of the repped nations in nijicontinent be adjusted to match picrel? See >>28821475 # for a comparison with the current borders. (Note that this vote does not include changes to /ahoy/ or the creation of the /nenmen/ (/luxnoc/) nation) You may propose any alternate border suggestions as well.Y if they've all agreed to them
>2. Should the borders of the unrepped nations in nijicontinent (ahoy, warkop, kr, nijimales) be adjusted to match picrel? You may specify which ones you agree with.N for /ahoy/, I'll still insist on adding an extra island for them somewhere to their northwest (though it won't pass). Y for the other threads
>3. Should /nenmen/ be added to the map as a separate nation with the borders in picrel?Y sure I guess, they seem stable enough
>4. Should /pcg/ receive the land from /clg/ proposed in >>28802251 # due to some of their chuubas moving from cyber to phase? You may propose your own suggestion as well.Y, it makes sense due to chuuba movements, non-canon lore turning into semi-canon lore is a side effect
>5. Several proposals have been made for updating nation names. Which of the following do you think should be changed?>>/obsy/->/rose/Abstain
>>/mikeneko/->/rumina/Y
>>/clg/->/aeg/Abstain
>6. If a thread is replaced by an obvious successor in the catalog should the relevant nation be able to be renamed without being put up to a vote?N
>7. To initiate a revote over an issue, currently one must have the support of at least three anons. Should this be changed to require the support of at least three reps/mediators?N. Funnily enough, I had proposed this when the initial question of revote initiation was brought to vote, but anons then said reps shouldn't have that much power and the other anon's participating in the thread should be allowed a voice (sort of like
change.org petitions irl I guess), and it does make sense.
