>>17651695>can’t defend his point, quotes his own indefensible point anyway to back himself upthe point was never attacked though? What's your counter argument on the 8hour work week being out of date? Or the new models of work being tried by different tech companies? You did a reduction on the 2hours by misattributing it and did a Fallacy fallacy.
>>17651754I post rat, sorry I am just super curious as to what this guy thinks
