>>106777330>>106781694>It's hard to do anything when she has an army of simpsIf it was an army of bad actors trying to push through a rep, you'd see stuff like poll results being one-sided, or multiple replies telling a detractor to let her be the rep. I checked the archives for when the /esmol/ manager asked about the rep in thread and it would go up for DAYS without a proper reply, so you can't use the "he made the thread on a bad day so we couldn't reply!" argument.
Lord of the Board's policy on thread representation has always been that the person that actually acts is the one with the right to make decisions. The manager is the one that got off their ass and filled out the form, so they're the one that gets to say what the rep is. While we encourage people to discuss things with their thread, and we filter out bad faith submissions, if we cannot find any reason to assume it's a bad faith submission (a faggot whining is not proof of bad faith), we will side with the person that actually did something over the people crying about not having done it the way THEY wanted. If you don't like the rep, submit your own next time. Same shit that /uoh/ does.
In this house, you can either get off your ass and do the work, or you can sit down and shut up. This is the easiest board event to get involved in. We have no respect to spare for whiny faggots that couldn't even be assed to fill out a form, and just complain that others didn't do it right. Either Be The Change or Begone.
