>>109536147I woke up a few hours ago and thought this was worth giving feedback on because it looked like you put some effort in and I was happy to see more anons doing novel numberfagging. Went to grab lunch first and when I came back I took a close look at your numbers and I was sadly disappointed.
The average you claim Kiara had is off by almost a full 1k. Your model predicted a 5000 average, so while you report a difference of 1.5k, the difference should only be 500. That 1k makes up 2/3 of your anomaly! We all know Kiara gets ~1k hat bots, so wouldn't it be rather nice if your model could predict at least a 1k disparity?
You also far oversell the accuracy of the model, as it seemingly predicts Ina and Kronii accurately within 100 CCV. After all, everyone knows Ina and Kronii have very stable CCV and don't get engined. However, we can see once adjusted for the real averages, your model actually overpredicts by 600 and 400 respectively. High accuracy on clean girls like Ina and Kronii would give your model more credibility.
For ERB, you reported an average of 6.3k, which matches your model's prediction. However, her real average was 5.3k. Implying that ERB should have a far high average is a rather tough sell, especially /here/, so it would be quite effortless to just give her a +1000 average to make your model align and avoid any criticism.
In Nimi's case, you went in the opposite direction. Your model predicted 9.3k against a real average of 9.6k, which is hardly worth talking about. But we all know the thread would want to see a larger gap for her. Wouldn't it be convenient to slide her up to 10.3k to give her a full 1k difference between your model and your fake average?
So to give you the benefit of the doubt, I'll be nice and say you are too retarded to be doing this kind of analysis if you don't know how to calculate average CCV correctly.
The alternative to having sub-80 IQ would be if you forged the numbers on purpose to match what people want to see and give yourself more credibility...
Surely an anon would never make up numbers in the numbers thread, though!
