>>32175605>any kind of concern about those collab where getting shutdown and mocked all over the internetI think I have a theory here, based on my new favorite chart.
>>32172284Unityfags and CGDCTfags are similar in the intensity of their positions but their reactions differ because of thee status quo. Unityfags typically stay quiet if a streamer decides not to do coed collabs because that was the default assumption. If they were going to fight it, they would be homobeggars by definition.
CGDCTfags on the other hand want the status quo to remain, and therefore voice their opinion when it changes.
Because unityfags would have accepted a lack of collabs, they perceive the CGDCTfags as more extreme than them for being publicly upset by the streamer's decision, assume that they are thinly-veiled unicorns hiding behind CGDCT talking points, and respond accordingly.