>>109845991Well, I didn't know about that post (I only knew his first response to her which he basically told her that he couldn't and wouldn't diagnose online and she should get herself checked at hospital instead - which, mind you, is what most doctors would say). Still, reading through it, doesn't sound like a melty to me still unless you are categorizing every long responses / addresses a "melty".
When I mentioned his melty (recently? few months ago? Don't quite remember since it popped up on my TL), he actually went on a meaningless short rant because someone said that he was clout-chasing IIRC
