>>4841186Remember that all this is done solely because your talent is being spammed, and you can't let the spammers win. You are wildly over-estimating just how many people will stop watching the videos which is where the content is and where the entertainment factor comes from, not from twitter or comments or chat. And if you aren't over-estimating the financial impact of reducing interaction then well you either live with the spam & work around it, or your company has a sword of Damocles over your head because what's stopping spammers from fucking with every holo until your company is dead?
>How do you block someone from spamming your hashtag? Look in coco's hashtag and sort by latest, it's all Chinese bots.Stop using hashtags. Or ignore the spam.
>Blocking replies scares off newcomers.So what, it's better than having chinkspam under every post.
>Bud, what would be the point? The main attraction of these girls is the interaction, Coco even cried during her 800k endurance when she thought new people wouldn't subscribe if chat was members only.Because Holo's are not based around "interaction" it's about their content. If you can't interact because of chink spam you either disable the interaction or ignore the spam. At the very least you can keep interaction via superchats.
>That could be true, but it's speculative.From what I've seen/read about Cover I don't think it's malicious in any way, it's just the natural situation of how a company built around making VR technology turns into a content creation company. Nintendo used to be a playing card company, Google was just a search engine, Amazon sold books online. When a company grows or becomes successful in an area outside the one they originally intended there's going to be growing pains.
