>>51452240>Your a literal anti>your just sabotaging foreign branchesBy... talking about them in an anonymous imageboard? I don't tweet at them, chat or comment on their streams/videos, I'm just avoiding them. The only thing I can do by not "sabotaging" them is to comment on their actions and discuss with other anons what effect they might have on their branch and the rest of the company. That said, I don't even make threads like this one, I only participate in ones that are already made and havea proper discussion going. Otherwise I just hang out in my oshi's general.
Also it's *you're, fucking hell how many times will you make this mistake
>since your not venting in JP, but trying to influence ENWhy would I try to influence /jp/ or 5chan? HoloJP is generally doing fine, the ones that could potentially damage the brand is EN (and ID), therefore it would make sense to focus the complains to, you know, the branch that is causing them. The most I can do, as I said above, is to try and make other anons supporting EN's current direction understand why I disagree with how EN is being managed, and how this may effect Cover as a whole.
As I said, I don't hate EN, I'm disappointed in the direction they're heading to. This includes both male collabs and talents (Gura) not streaming regularly. They have/had a lot of potential for growth and for establishing HoloJP's version of "idol culture" in the west, and yet they squandered it (they referring to both EN talents and management).
>when you should be setting an example and leading the wayThis is what anons making these threads, and anons like me replying to anons like you, are trying to do. You're painting this as sabotage, however, and therefore are unable to understand what example we are setting.
