>>105399286>It's more about the streamers than the output, having a low output doesn't help either though>Hololive hasn't been hiring good streamersAh, come on, that's a completely different topic altogether and one that is so subjective I have zero interest in discussing.
It's a dumb one too, considering the latest HoloEN hire debuted more than a year ago.
> It also isn't a very conductive enviroment to streaming. >If it continues that way for years to come, people will slowly leave.That's a thankful return the original subject, people leaving Hololive because of not enough streaming.
On that point I made my argument at
>>105399114 and even an "years long" prediction coming from your argument would certainly have been proved right now, no?
Three years have passed since the GRIM era, that should have been enough time for the prediction to materialise.
But it didn't, VShojo (the streaming specialist company) died, their former stars now turned Indies are all in a steep recline from their 2021 / 2022 numbers, Twitch vtubers are likewise spinning their wheels, either stagnated or reclining and going around in a never-ending circular firing squad and, numberwise, the only "saving grave" for the indie vtubing world right now comes from the singing, dancing, 3D live performing, live concert presenting holos turned former Holos and, even then, in a very watered down form (numberwise)
In short: I disagree. I disagree that Holos have any low output now in relation to much dire eras, I disagree that low streaming output would cause any significant dent on Hololive audience, I disagree that even a "slow trickle out" would be noticeable considering the "slow trickle in" caused by the "rabbit hole" would offset that and also disagree that the quality of Holo hires
>which I'm not entering in the merit of the claim because I genuinely like themwould impact in any of these points in a way that they wouldn't have done when they got hired in the first place.
