>>101994582I'm not moving the goal posts I'm clarifying the point further because you want to be facetious. You deliberately wanted to find a loop hole and used the fact that gay men exist who make up a tiny portion of the vtubing audience as proof that men in general, of whom the vast majority are straight men who watch women, will watch male vtubers and those male vtubers will have an audience primarily made up of men.
This does not disprove or provide credible evidence to disprove my original point, nor is it helpful to the original commentor.
The vast majority of the male vtuber audience is women. The vast majority of revenue is generated through women. Yes, gay men exist, however they do not constitute a majority of the audience of male vtubers or a majority of the revenue. It is an exceptional case. Therefore are you going to recommend someone who is a male vtuber after success to appeal to gay men, or to appeal to women? You're going to say women because that's where the numbers are.
Have I dumbed this down enough for your lobotomized ass to understand?
