>>100063415Sweety, I'm not going to waste my time arguing with you. I knew, for a fact, that if I simply showed the clip, someone would go "She didn't say 'great replacement'", so I provided a direct link to what the great replacement is (the reference). Her words are a one-to-one match with the conspiracy theory. Please, in the future, read the assigned material before commenting.
>>100063802The "replacement" in the "Great Replacement" refers to an actual replacement (like a literal one; again see the phrase "you have one people, and in the space of a generation you have a different people" detailed in my reference). The belief is that you have "replaced" the population within the generation rather than when that generation is gone. What you've provided is an accurate description of what I explained in "B" (which existed to counter the underlying rhetoric of the great replacement theory)---which is to say addition is not replacement. Your article exists as a possible means of filling for predicted HOLES in a demographic (that were caused by natural and/or non-hostile factors). The "replacement" of "Replacement Immigration" is akin to getting a new lawnmower when the last one you had was broken beyond repair. The "replacement" of the "Great Replacement Theory" refers to a belief in getting rid of an active entity that is already in existence, hence why they think it's hostile. ie Like having a perfectly functional lawnmower and getting a new one to replace the working one. These are two separate things. Considering the fact that the Great Replacement Theory came after the your provided report, it is clear that it comes from a misreading/inaccurate analysis (likely deliberate) of the initial report.
Anyway, good morning, afternoon, evening. Hope I've been helpful for you.
