>>100208839That's not a breach of contract though, anon. So you were just talking nonsense? Establishing breach of contract requires several conditions to be met, none of which were even close to happening around the MV release. The main issues there were her manager failing to obtain permissions for a scheduled release in a timely manner, and failing to provide clear instructions.
In absence of clear instructions to delay, a contracted worker like Doki was at the time is in no position to change a scheduled release on her own, she legitimately did nothing wrong in posting the MV when she did. Furthermore, if she was a contracted employee Nijisanji did not have the authority to demand (they could have requested, but not demanded) a delay, nor did they have the authority to take down her work unilaterally, as she was not an employee, and they would have been the ones overstepping their authority by a very problematic degree. Again, they would have been entitled to request a takedown, not force it without the consent of the author.
Assuming she was not a contracted worker and was instead an employee, she would still not be entitled to unilaterally decide to delay a scheduled release without clear instructions, unless she was specifically entitled to make decisions as to the release of the MV, in which case her decision to post it was still entirely correct.
No matter how you slice it, Niji fucked up in every way here.
