>>100229218Btw now that the thread is dead snacker, I know you are trying to say that whatever lesson you could be learning from him would be tainted by bad morals and bad outcomes, and therefore not worth learning as all his lessons would inherently be problematic and making them applicable in a way that isn't morally wrong would take too much effort and or time to be worth it.
And that is exactly what I'd call a failure of critical thinking. If you can't differiantiate morals and methods used, can't keep your own morals straight while only taking the good things from someone else's strategies, but instead assume that anything you take from him would wholesale bring all morals and baggage attached with it and therefore override whatever moral foundations you have is peak npc behavior. Integrating what other people do into your own moral system isn't "effort", it's something that should be a basic critical thinking skill, figuring out what is good and what isn't and what you can learn from it. Everything else is the literal definition of being a sheep, but go off oh smartest snacker in the room.
