>>100242756>Deflection with evidence is deflectionIndeed it is. I'm not sure how you think the concept of evidence changes the nature of deflection. You could go on a spiel about how trees grow better in sunlight with proof to back it up, and would just be deflection all the same. In even simpler terms; It's irrelevant you utter muppet.
>The constant evidence the artist is legit!.... such as.... my nonsensical claims that she is endorsed by the media, which is entirely irrelevant and not at all evidence of legitimacy!Funny guy. Next you'll tell me Dr. Oz is an amazing doctor because he was "endorsed by mainstream media" lmao. What a dumb fucking guy.
>That's not what happened>Source: My anusCool story dog. But the artists all seem to think otherwise
>>100242642 Pattern recognition doko?
>A-as we can see, my headcanon proves my headcanon!Ah yeah, I see that's how you're trying to spin things, which is obviously laughable.
Now can we get back to pattern recognition? Why are you dodging this concept so much after bringing it up? Are you okay?
