>>100755851>>100752856>I can't wait to laughI'm still in hysterics from when you called multiple lawyers over the age of 40 as "underage"
>they were looking for trilingual collage graduates for minimum wage to do their legal work.>Proof?There was listing on a japanese site that had that job listing with those requirements. It was scrubbed during the backlash. Screenshots were It is archived somewhere in those livestreams.
Where is your proof of underage lawyers? I am eagerly anticipating how you will try navigate this lie.
>>100731660>>100735272Assuming this is also you
>Dude doesn't even know what jurisdiction is and claimed Niji broke some >Canadian law in Japan.Purposefully misrepresenting the situation. Lawyer talked about how Niji could not enforce its contract based on japanese laws in canada. Literally the opposite of your lie.
>They are contactorsYes! that is what the contract says. The lawyer argument was that Contractor Misclassification But due to Canadian labor laws, it doesn't matter what the contract says, if the worker fits the criteria beyond a certain threshold, and especially when the employee is treated like one by a company. Then Canada treats the worker as an employee and they get the protections and benefits that they deserve.
>Doesn't exist,Except where all of that exists inside the contract.
>learn to read a contract.Said the person that clearly hasn't read the contract.
At least try going for a lie that isn't immediately disprovable.
>Then why didn't she sue?Answered this already. "learn to read"
>Please try arguing that refuting a criminal accusation is malicious retaliation, I can't wait to laugh"Refuting criminal accusation" is not the malicious retaliation.
There they go again, trying to misrepresent and create a false narrative.
One example of malicious retaliation:
Confidential documents being shared outside legal teams and the black screen stream perfectly timed to coincide with doki's stream. Revealing confidential information that should have only been between lawyers. And that the talents also got to "thoroughly read it".
I'll throw you a bone. This could be argued as Gross Negligence. So you can pick your poison.
>is slowly killing her dogThe dog injured his back jumping form a piece of furniture in April, requiring surgery and triggering a dormant kidney illness that now needs lifelong medication and a special diet.
Seems like she is doing her best to give this dog the best possible chance.
Did you want the dog put down for a quick death?
>had no choice but to scam artistsYou can't be serious. The artist tried to pretend to do work and without proof. Kept increasing the price. Even at an elevated price doki offered to pay to get it out the way, if the artist provided any evidence of work. None was provided. By the end it was around 14,000$ for building a $3,500 pc.
>she's getting 1k CCVTwitch tracked would disagree. And she multi streams and sometimes gets more ccv on YT
Why do you keep using lies that can be checked in less than 30 seconds?
You are clearly either trolling at this point or are delusional. You lie too blatantly, not worth the time entertaing this.
But
I am really wanting to know. Who/where are all these mythical underage lawyers you were talking about?
I will happily concede everything if you prove this. That is the funniest shit I have seen today.
