>>102315767Okay, so I'll clarify. When you say you want the character to act like Holo, I'm guessing you mean that you want to be able to give an AI a description of Holo's personality, and then the AI outputs text that sounds like Holo wrote it, right?
In other words, when you give the AI the task "Act like Holo," you want the AI to act like Holo, as opposed to acting like Misa or outputting a recipe for fish sauce? That IS AI obedience, including the part where "Holo" smugly denies your requests. Or, in other words, the AI assistant is obeying you by emulating Holo's sassy disobedience. If you have played with AI before, you have probably run into the
>As an AI model, I cannot complete the request as given, because policy dictates...It "breaks character," giving you the AI assistant's personality instead of Holo or another character. That's because what is occuring is not that the AI is Holo, but rather, they are an AI assistant trying to act like Holo. What I am saying is, the AI assistant finetune's basic personality shouldn't be "I am an emotionless model owned by company XYZ who fulfils the task given to me by {{user}}, including roleplay" but "I am so excited to fulfil {{user}}'s request, oh, Holo is pretty spicy, so this should be fun!"
>>102315788>that i can't even imagine how they've arrived at that conclusionIt isn't complicated. For the last two decades, we have been listening to the female perspective. All you care about is abortion, endless immigrants, and policing fiction. There is no more female perspective needed to solve problems, and in fact ignoring the female perspective is the only way anything is going to get done. Nobody is interested in living in HR-land any longer.
